Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (1) TMI 398

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r deleting disallowance of interest u/s.36(1)(iii) on the plea that assessee was having sufficient own funds for investment in subsidiary company. 3. At the outset, learned AR placed on record the order of the Tribunal for A.Y.2008-09 dated 11/09/2017, wherein both the issues raised by assessee during the year under consideration were decided in favour of the assessee. We had carefully gone through the orders of the Tribunal wherein disallowance made u/s.14A was deleted by Tribunal after observing as under:- "6. We heard the rival submissions and gone through the orders of the tax authorities below. We have also gone through the case law relied upon before us. From the computation statement as well as the Balance Sheet as submit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....so covered in favour of assessee by the order of the Tribunal. We have gone through the order of the Tribunal dated 11/09/2017, wherein the Tribunal concluded as under:- "We have heard the rival submissions and carefully considered the same along with the orders of the tax authorities below. We have gone through the provisions of Section 43(5) which defines speculative transaction. We noted that as per the definition given in sub-section (5) the transaction entered into cannot be treated to a speculative transaction. The definition of speculative transactions under section 43(5) is an exhaustive one and the term 'commodity' including shares and stocks but does not include currency. (a) The term 'commodity' is define....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... cancel forward contracts. The presumption of any speculative transaction is, therefore, directly rebutted in view of the legal impossibility and in view of the fact that foreign currency was neither commodity nor shares." (f) The Special Bench of ITAT Kolkata in the case of Shree Capital Services Ltd. v. ACIT 121 ITD 498 has held that derivatives with underlying as shares and securities should be also considered as commodities as the underlying shares and securities as specifically included within the term commodities. Accordingly, transactions in security derivatives are subject to the provisions of S. 43(5). However, a currency cannot be termed as a commodity so as to attract the provisions of S. 43(5). Jurisdictional B....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of diamonds. These concurrent finding of facts are not shown to be perverse in any manner. In fact, the Assessing Officer also in the Assessment Order does not find that the transaction entered into by the Respondent assessee was speculative in nature. It further holds that at no point of time did Revenue challenge the assertion of the Respondent assessee that the activity of entering into forward contract was in the regular course of its business only to safeguard against the loss on account of foreign exchange variation. Even before the Tribunal, we find that there was no submission recorded on behalf of the Revenue that the Respondent assessee should be called upon to explain the nature of its transactions. Thus, the submission now bein....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r (supra). In the above case, this court has held that forward contract in foreign exchange when incidental to carrying on business of cotton exporter and done to cover up losses on account of differences in foreign exchange valuations, would not be speculative activity but a business activity." 14. Similarly the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case CIT vs. M/s. London Star Diamond Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. in appeal No. 712 of 2014 vide its order dated 19th October, 2016 on similar question decided the issue in favour of the assessee. Following the decision of the CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co. again when similar issue went before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in ITA No. 1440 of 2014 in the case of CIT vs. M/s. Jaimin Jeweller ....