Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (1) TMI 159

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner (AR) for the respondent ORDER Per : Justice Dr. Satish Chandra Both the appeals have been filed against Order-in-Original No: 396/25V/2007/COMMR/RH dated 15/11/2007. The period of dispute is April 2001 to March 2005. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the activity of fabrication of structure such as skylights, space frames, glazing systems, etc. which ar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The materials are to be put in use at the customer s site. The customers place the formal order and appellant will have to engage the sub-contract to perform the task for fabrication, erections, bonding installation of sheets of glasses, etc. Accordingly, the roof structure glazing systems were fabricated by the appellant s labour contractor with the help of raw material. The said activity never a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....S rods, MS channels, and mild steel flats. The case of the appellants squarely stands covered by the ratio of law laid down in that case and as such, no duty demand could be confirmed against them. That order of the Tribunal has already attained finality. Even the Apex Court has upheld that order by dismissing the appeal of the Revenue as reported in 1996 (82) E.L.T. A158 Court Room Highlights." ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....It is 2nd round of litigation before the Tribunal as earlier on 18.07.2007, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority. In consequence, the present impugned order has been passed by the adjudicating authority. 9. In the present case, the appellants have no workshop to carry out the fabrication like cutting, welding, grinding etc. The appellants gave the work to a sub-contracto....