2018 (1) TMI 150
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t ORDER Per: Mrs. Archana Wadhwa After hearing both the sides duly represented by Shri Suyash Agarwal, Adv. for the appellant and Mohd. Altaf (AC) AR for the Revenue, I find that vide their impugned orders, the appellants have been denied the benefit of Cenvat Credit of duty of Rs. 97,445/- on the ground that the same stands availed by them on the basis of the forged invoices of one M/s S....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iscation of the goods and imposition of penalty. This notice culminated into an order passed by the Original Adjudicating Authority denying the credit of Rs. 97,445/-, confiscating the goods with an option to the appellant to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 6,50,000/- and with imposition of penalty of Rs. 3,00,000/- in terms of Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. 5. On a....
TaxTMI