Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (6) TMI 819

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ies (P.) Ltd. S. Balasubramanian, Vice-Chairman and K.K. Balu, Member For the Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Shankaranarayanan, Adv. For the Respondents/Defendant: S. Ravi and Krishna Srinivasan, Advs. ORDER Balasubramanian, Vice-Chairman 1. In this petition filed under section 111(4) of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'), the petitioners have challenged registration of the transfe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... transfers on two grounds. One is that when original share certificates were in the custody of Shri M.D. Chhabria, the company could not have issued duplicate certificate without following the established procedure and that transfer of the shares was not in accordance with the provisions of articles. 3. The respondents have filed a reply. According to them, the duplicate shares were issued at the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts. There is nothing on record to show as to why the second respondent sought for the duplicate certificates and whether the board of directors of the company had satisfied itself that either the original certificates had been lost or destroyed as provided in rule 4(3) of the Companies (Issue of Share Certificates) Rules, 1960. Therefore, the issue of duplicate certificates itself was invalid, esp....