2017 (1) TMI 1509

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent. ORDER [Order per : D.N. Patel, J.]. - Counsel for the appellant is present, however, counsel for the respondents is absent. 2. It appears from the facts of the case that the refund application was preferred by the respondent for Rs. 7,70,889.48 on 4-10-2006 on account of double payment of the duty on the same goods. 3. It further appears from the facts of the case that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... This order was passed on 23rd April, 2009 by the Commissioner (Appeals) by Order-in-Appeal No. 52/JSR/2009. 5. Against this remand order, appeal was preferred by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Jamshedpur before CESTAT, Kolkata, East Zonal Bench. The appeal has been dismissed by the Tribunal vide order dated 28-10-2009, being Order No. A-659/KOL/2009. 6. It appears that this ap....