Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (12) TMI 1002

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessment year 2010-11 vide order dated 06-03-2013 under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter 'the Act'). 2. The only issue in this appeal of assessee is against the order of CIT(A) confirming the action of the AO in disallowing expenses relatable to exempt income by invoking the provisions of section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules (hereinafter the 'Rules') amounting to Rs. 1,00,53,364/-. 3. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee is engaged in the business of investment and finance. During the year under consideration the assessee suo moto made a disallowance of a sum of Rs. 37,38,476/- under section 14A of the Act while computing his income. The AO while framing the assessment worked o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. HDFC Bank Limited 366 ITR 505 and CIT vs Reliance Utilities 313 ITR 340, it is presumed that the assessee has made investment out of its own funds which are sufficient to cover the value of investment, in that case, no disallowance of interest is required to be made under section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Rules. When this was confronted to the learned Sr. Departmental Representative, he fairly conceded the position. As the issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee, respectfully following the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of HDFC Bank (supra), we allow this issue of assessee's appeal. 5. With regard to the administrative expenses, the learned Counsel ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... written submissions dated 21.06.2016 to stress the point that even if the assessee under a mistake or misconception has over assessed itself in the return of income, the Tribunal can give relief to the assessee to the extent the assessee is over assessed and direct the lower authorities to tax the assessee as per the provisions of law. We find that in the case of "National Thermal Power Co. Ltd." vs. CIT" 229 ITR 383, the facts before the Hon'ble Supreme Court were that the assessee in that case offered the interest amount for taxation and the assessment was completed on that basis. Before the Ld. CIT (A), the assessee though had taken a number of grounds of appeal; however, the inclusion of the said amount of interest was not challenged. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....full bench of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of "Ahmedabad Electricity Company Ltd. vs. CIT" and "Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. CIT" by way of a common order dated 30.04.1992 (1993) 199 ITR 351 has observed that the basic purpose of an appeal procedure in an income tax matter is to ascertain the correct tax liability of the assessee in accordance with law. Therefore, at both the stages, either by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner or before the Appellate Tribunal, the appellate authority can consider the proceedings before it and the material on record before it for the purpose of determining the correct tax liability of the assessee. The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of "CIT vs. Pruthvi Brokers and Shareholders Pvt. L....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ll not be less than the returned income was considered by the Hon'ble High Court and it was held that as per proviso to section 119 of the Act, the Board cannot issue instructions to the Income Tax Authority to make a particular assessment or to dispose of a particular case in a particular manner as well as not to interfere with the discretion of the Commissioner in exercise of his appellate functions. It was further held that the AO, while exercising his quasi judicial powers, was not bound by the said circular and should have exercised his powers independently. The Hon'ble High Court, therefore, directed the AO to make the assessment without keeping in mind the said circular. It may be further observed that the Hon'ble Bombay High Court i....