2017 (12) TMI 947

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. Parasivamurthy, AR - For the Respondent ORDER Per: S.S. GARG The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 22.5.2014 passed by the Commissioner (A), whereby the Commissioner (A) has rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of transformers and allied items and during the dis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3. Heard both the parties and perused the records. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law as the same has been passed contrary to the provisions of the Act. He further submitted that whenever there is price variation clause, and if the duty paid is more at the time of clearance of the goods, then the assessee is entitled to refund of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....07 (207) ELT 31 (P & H) • Maharashtra Cylinders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CESTAT, Mumbai: 2010 (259) ELT 369 (Bom.) • Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd. Vs. CCE: 2004 (166) ELT 474 (Tri.-Del.) • Punjab Digital Indus. Systems Ltd. Vs. CCE: 2008 (232) ELT 811 (Tri.-Del.) • Premier Plastics Pipe Indus. Vs. CCE, Raipur: 2006 (205) ELT 938 (Tri.-Del.) ....