2016 (12) TMI 1664

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DR.) SATISH CHANDRA, PRESIDENT AND HON BLE SHRI ASHOK K. ARYA, MEMBER(TECHNICAL) Shri Naresh Thaker, Advocate for the Appellant Shri K.Choudhary, Supdt.(AR) for the Revenue JUDGEMENT Per Shri Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra. All the Appeals have been filed against different orders dated 26.03.2014, 17.07.2015 and 08.01.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Servic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion pertaining to the earlier Notification No.21/2008 was issued where the benefit of the refund was confined to only 56%. Thus, the Appellant has lost benefit of 44%. The Competent Authority has also declined to refund the benefit of 56% out of the 100% payment of duty by stating that the earlier refund will have to be re-credited for want of 44% of that amount. Being aggrieved, the Appellant has....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Sikkim. If the Notification upholds then assessee will not have any claim before the Tribunal. On the other side, if the Notification set aside then the Appellant will have the remedy before the Tribunal. Hence, crux of the problem is lying with the validity of the Notification dated 27.03.2008 which can be decided only by the Hon'ble High Court and cer....