2017 (11) TMI 1534

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l Consultants for the Applicant Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the Respondents ORDER P. C. 1. The present Notice of Motion is taken out in April 2013 seeking implementation of the following direction issued by the Division Bench of this Court under the Order dated 5th February, 2010: "The Respondents are, therefore, directed to refund duty drawback for the period from 1st June, 1989....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted to submit documents / records in support of their claim. I say that the Petitioners replied that the same are unavailable with them. I say that the department is therefore unable to examine and process the claim for drawback." 3. Shri Phalake has conveniently not referred to the order dated 5th February, 2010 which was passed in Review Petition No. 3 of 2010 after hearing the respondents. W....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....om House, Ballard Estate Mumbai. Paragraph 12 of the said reply deals with paragraph 19 in which there is a specific reliance placed on details given in Exhibit W. The contents of ExhibitW have not been disputed in the said reply. 6. It is not case made out by the respondents that in terms of the order dated 5th February, 2010 refund of duty drawback has been issued. 7. Thus, the respondents....