Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (4) TMI 878

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for Assessment Years 2004-05 and Assessment Years 2001-02 to 2003-04 respectively vide his orders dated 31.12.2008. 2. The first common issue in these appeals of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the reopening of assessment u/s. 148 r.w.s 147 of the Act. For this, assessee has raised common ground in all the years and the grounds raised in AY 2004-05 read as under: "1. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of Deputy C.I.T. as correct in reopening the assessment u/s. 147 whereas the Notice issued u/s. 148 is bad in law barred by limitation and ab initio void. 2. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of Deputy C.I.T. that deductio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....According to AO, while accepting return u/s. 143(1)(a) of the Act, there is escapement of income as they required recalculation of amount of deduction allowed u/s. 80HHC of the Act at Rs. 5,96,394/- instead of excess claim of Rs. 9,62,104/-. The AO recomputed the income vide his assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act by computing deduction considering the provisions of section 80HHC(3)(a) of the Act at a figure of Rs. 5,96,392/- as against the claim of the assessee at Rs. 15,58,496/-. Aggrieved, assessee challenged reassessment proceedings before CIT(A), who confirmed the reopening by observing as under: "The appellant filed return of income declaring income of Rs. 23,51,310/-. The income return is accepted u/s. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is that the AO noticed from the record that assessee has claimed deduction u/s. 80HHC of the Act at Rs. 15,58,496/- by invoking the provision of section 80HHC(3)(b) of the Act by treating the same as manufacturing concern. According to CIT(A), the AO noticed that the deduction u/s. 80HHC of the Act is available to the manufacturing concern as per section 80HHC(3)(a) of the Act, which AO has rightly computed during the reopened assessment. The AO noticed from the tax audit report that the nature of business is mentioned as 'trading, manufacturing and export'. The first issue whether the AO has any tangible material in his possession for reopening of the assessment is available or not or he has reopened on the basis of already processed retur....