2017 (11) TMI 693
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(Advocate) - for Appellant(s) Shri Rajeev Ranjan (Joint Commr.) AR - for Respondent(s) ORDER Per: Anil Choudhary The above stated appeals are arising out of impugned Order-in-Appeal No.246-250-CE/APPL-LKO/LKO/2014 dated 25.11.2014 having a common issue. Therefore, they are taken together for decision. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are manufacturer of biscuit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....notices demanding Central Excise duty on intermediate product on sugar syrup, captively consumed, in the manufacture of biscuits. The various show cause notices were adjudicated through various Orders-in-Original where the demands were confirmed. Aggrieved by the said Orders-in-Original appellant preferred appeal before learned Commissioner (Appeals). Learned Commissioner (Appeals) through above s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....de the impugned Order-in-Appeal, in the said appeal, on the same issue, in favor of the assessee. 4. Heard the learned AR who has agreed that the present appeals are squarely covered by Final Order of this Tribunal in above stated case. 5. Having considered the rival submissions from both sides and on perusal of record we find that this Tribunal relied on the decision by Coordinate Bench in ....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI