2013 (3) TMI 764
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shri D.P. Singh i/b Dr. G.R. Sharma and Pradeep S. Jetly, for the Respondent. ORDER P.C. : The petitioner had initiated proceedings before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing letters dated 6 July, 2011, 27 July, 2011, 8 August, 2011, 14 November, 2011 and 7 October, 2012 by which the Director General of Foreign Trade declined to consider the case of the petitioner....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ve been issued to the petitioner respectively by the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade and Additional Director General of Foreign Trade. Copies of these notices are at Exhibits K and L and are sought to be impugned in these proceedings. On 4 January, 2013 two orders have been passed by the Union Government in the Ministry of Commerce rejecting a request made by the petitioner for the grant o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....action that was initiated by the DGFT was founded on the investigation that was conducted by the DRI, Mumbai. It was in that view of the matter, and since the Court was informed that the DRI had completed an investigation and had issued a notice to show cause, that the Court had directed that a fresh order would be passed by the DGFT in the light of the report submitted by the DRI, Mumbai. The imp....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e notice of the DRI dated 17/20 February, 2012 in respect of which a hearing is scheduled to be held on 21 March, 2013; (ii) The adjudicating officer shall in pursuance of the notice referred to in (i) above, pass an order of adjudication after hearing the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today as stated before the Court; (iii) The hearing of the not....
TaxTMI