2015 (3) TMI 1298

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oktan and Ms. Mahima Bahl, Advocates For The Respondent. ORDER CM No.4259/2015 (early hearing) 1. With the consent of the parties, the captioned application for early hearing is allowed. 2. The petition is put on board for hearing. W.P.(C) 7873/2014 and CM No.18469/2014 3. By way of this writ petition, a challenge is laid to the order dated 05.08.2014. By the impugned order, petitioner no.2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that in so far as petitioner no.2 was concerned, permission was accorded on the same facts, twice, i.e., in 2005 and 2008. It is also Mr. Kapur's contention that in the application filed with the respondents, in particular, in Annexure VII, it was indicated that petitioner no.2 was a non-Executive Director in companies to which there is an oblique reference in the impugned order. 6.1 In other wor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....actory state of affairs. This error could have occurred, possibly, for two reasons. First, prolixity of the record. Second, on account of failure of the respondents to seek participation of the petitioners in the proceedings. 8. Therefore, in view of the above, the impugned order is set aside having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case. The respondents will, thus, issue a n....