2015 (3) TMI 1298

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Sanjugeeta Moktan and Ms. Mahima Bahl, Advocates For The Respondent. ORDER CM No.4259/2015 (early hearing) 1. With the consent of the parties, the captioned application for early hearing is allowed. 2. The petition is put on board for hearing. W.P.(C) 7873/2014 and CM No.18469/2014 3. By way of this writ petition, a challenge is laid to the order dated 05.08.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e learned senior counsel for the petitioners says that in so far as petitioner no.2 was concerned, permission was accorded on the same facts, twice, i.e., in 2005 and 2008. It is also Mr. Kapur's contention that in the application filed with the respondents, in particular, in Annexure VII, it was indicated that petitioner no.2 was a non-Executive Director in companies to which there is an oblique ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iced in the impugned order, leading to a very unsatisfactory state of affairs. This error could have occurred, possibly, for two reasons. First, prolixity of the record. Second, on account of failure of the respondents to seek participation of the petitioners in the proceedings. 8. Therefore, in view of the above, the impugned order is set aside having regard to the peculiar facts and circumsta....