Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (3) TMI 763

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2006-07, following questions of law have been proposed for our consideration. "a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in confirming the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ? b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as Rs. 1.52 crores and not Rs. 1.83 crores. Consequently, an amount of Rs. 30.65 lakhs was added to the income of the assessee in quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings were also initiated. 4. The respondent - assessee pointed out that by mistake they have computed the book value of the asset as per the Companies Act instead of computing the same under the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act&#3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e same has not been found to be false by the Revenue. Further the Tribunal also records the fact that as the machinery was converted into stock-in-trade at book value, there was no short term capital gain or loss in such transaction. Hence, the mistake was genuine and bona fide. The Tribunal placed reliance upon the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Relian....