Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (11) TMI 460

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....KURESHI) 1 Revenue is in appeal against the judgement of I.T.A.T dated 09.06.2016, raising following questions for consideration: "[A] Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the decision of ITAT in deleting the addition made on the basis of statements of the partners of the firm quantifying the unaccounted expenditure in land development is justified igno....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re also cited for retraction. The assessee firm filed the return admitting an income of Rs. 89.13 lacs, which included unaccounted income of Rs. 76.10 lacs. 3 The Assessing Officer, despite such developments proceeded to make addition of the entire sum of Rs. 2.35 crores admitted by the partner in a survey statement, which was later on retracted. In appeal, the CIT(A) deleted the addition prima....