2017 (11) TMI 405

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Amresh Jain, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : B. Ravichandran, Member (T)]. - The appeal is against order dated 21-9-2010 of Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur-I. The appellants are engaged in stock broker business. The dispute in the present appeal relates to Service Tax liability of the appellant on the amount received from their clients under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s consideration is to be treated as taxable under the said heading. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order upheld the demand on this account. 3. We have heard both the sides and perused the appeal records. 4. Ld. Counsel for the appellant contested the proceedings before the lower authorities mainly on the ground that the same are beyond the scope of the show....