2017 (11) TMI 133

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For the Respondents : Mr. K. Venkatesh ORDER With the consent of the learned counsel on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), the first respondent, in a petition for stay, in S.P.No.13 of 2017, in APV No.16 of 2017, dated 07.04.2017. 3. Agg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o furnish security in the form of a bank guarantee, on or before 08.05.2017. 5. Heard Ms.C.Rekha Kumari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, accepting notice on behalf of the respondent, and perused the materials available on record. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was ready and willing ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petition is partly allowed, and the condition imposed by the first respondent in the impugned order with regard to furnishing of bank guarantee is set aside, and the condition is modified to the following effect:- i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for the balance tax amount and penalty for the respective assessment year, in lieu of furnishing bank guarantee, within a period ....