Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2015 (5) TMI 1131

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....May, 2012 which are at Annexure2 series, out of which one issued to service recipient, another is to JUSCO, third to Axis Bank and 4th to Bank of Baroda mainly for the reason that these notices were issued in pursuance of show cause notice passed by the Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Jamshedpur signed on 29th July, 2011. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that this show cause notice has been adjudicated upon by the Additional Commissioner and he passed an order on 30.07.2012 thereafter, the said order was challenged before the Commissioner (Appeals) (insisting for deposition of the amount) and therefore, the order was passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) to deposit the much higher amount and hence, the order passed by the Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... we hereby, quash and set aside all the four notices dated 9th May, 2012 which are at Annexure2 series out of which one is issued to the service recipient, 2nd to JUSCO, 3rd to Axis Bank and 4th to Bank of Baroda mainly for following facts and reasons: (i) Respondents had issued show cause notice to this petitioner dated 20/29th July, 2011 under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 for the payment of the service tax, totaling to Rs. 49,90,780/. (ii) Thereafter, the said show cause notice issued by the Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Jamshedpur was adjudicated upon vide order dated 30th July, 2012. (iii) The said order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax, was challenged by this petitioner befor....