2017 (10) TMI 694
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r. K. Venkatesh ORDER Heard Mr.Manoharan S.Sundaram, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate for the respondents. With the consent on either side these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has challenged the orders of assessment passed under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (in short TNVAT Ac....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he respondent to furnish the copy of the assessment order to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the said order, leaving it open to the petitioner to agitate the same before the competent forum. 3. The petitioner has challenged the impugned proceedings primarily on three grounds. Firstly, on the ground that the procedure required to be followed under Rule 19 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....respect of other end dealer in the departmental website. 6. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be afforded one more opportunity to go before the Assessing Officer and put forth their objections as the pattern of assessment is identical to all the assessment orders and the revision of assessment itself is based upon rep....
TaxTMI