2017 (10) TMI 615

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ORDER The fact of the case is that appellant is Charitable Education Trust. One M/s. Man Infra Construction Limited provided construction service to the appellant and on the value of the service they paid Service Tax. The appellant on the belief that the said service is not liable for service tax filed refund claim on 16-11-2010 in the capacity of recipient of the service. The refund was sanct....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the service provider are providing both exempted and taxable service therefore they were covered within the ambit of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, therefore for verification of compliance of Rule 6 that reversal of 6% of exempted taxable value, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority, which is absolutely incorrect and not the subject matter of this refund. She submits that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at. She referred to the Board Circular No.766/82/2003-CX dated 15-12-2003 which clarifies that Cenvat credit should not be denied to the user-manufacturer as long as bonafide nature of the consignee's transaction is not doubted. Further, if the manufacturer -supplier has received payment from the buyer in respect of goods supplied including excise duty, action should be initiated against manufactu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n at the end of the service provider regarding compliance of the Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as the service provider has provided exempted as well as taxable service. The fact is not under dispute that appellant have received the service from the service provider and they have paid service charges alongwith service tax charged to them, when this is so, then said service tax borne by the ap....