2017 (10) TMI 576
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....br>Customs<br>T. S. Sivagnanam, J. For the Petitioner : Mr. S. Murugappan For the Respondents : Mr. B. Rabu Manohar, SPC Mr.S.Rajasekar. SPC ORDER Heard Mr.S.Murugappan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.B.Rabu Manohar, learned Senior Panel counsel accepting notice for respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.S.Rajasekar, learned Senior Panel counsel accepting notice for the third respondent. B....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sals in this notices and levied penalty for non fulfillment of export obligations. 4. Later, when the petitioner came to know about it, they submitted two application to the first respondent stating that they have not received the copies of the adjudication orders and requesting the copies to be furnished. This request was complied with and the Office of the first respondent, by letters dated 2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... only from the date, on which, the petitioner received copies of the adjudication orders from the office of the first respondent i.e. 28.8.2015 and if that date is reckoned, the petitioner's appeal petitions filed on 28.9.2015 are well within the period of limitation. Be that as it may, I find that the petitioner has submitted the applications for redemption along with the bank realization cer....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....be directed to consider the petitioner's applications dated 25.9.2015 claiming redemption. In the mean time, the impugned orders should not be give an effect or otherwise, the petitioner would be put to prejudice. 8. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of and the impugned orders shall be kept in abeyance and the first respondent is directed to consider the applications dated 25.9....
TaxTMI