2017 (10) TMI 256

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent : Mr. S. Kanmani Annamalai ORDER Heard Mr.P.V.Sudakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondent. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel on either side, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The petitioner is before this Court for the second time pert....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d out that even after a lapse of more than 6 months, the petitioner did not choose to file any records substantiating their contention that local transfers were excluded in the petition already submitted. Therefore, the contention of the petitioner that the transfer from their godown at Madurantakam to their office at Chennai was wrongly stated as inter-State stock transfer, whereas it is within t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....which the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it has been enclosed. Thus, without standing on technicalities, this Court is of the view that the petitioner could be given an opportunity to go before the officer and produce the details. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be able to produce the invoices also for the stock transfer from Mad....