Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

consistency in income tax assessments

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onsistency in income tax assessments<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - satbir singhwahi Dated:- 28-9-2017 Last Reply Date:- 29-9-2017 Income Tax<br>Got 10 Replies<br>Income Tax<br>Sir If interest expences are allowed in past assessments years u/s 143(3), whether consistency in assessments need to maintained.Pls guide any case laws. Reply By MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN: The Reply: Your query is not to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the point. Please furnish your correct query. Reply By satbir singhwahi: The Reply: Sir During assessment u/s 143(3) , interest paid on loans taken was allowed in Assessment year 2008-09 to 2012-13.Now in assessment year 2013-14 the A.O. disallowed 1/10th of interest expence. The matter is now in appeal. The loan was taken in 2008-09 and deployed in business.So consistency in assessment to be m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aintained if facts are same. Any case law to help. Reply By MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN: The Reply: What is the reason given by the department in disallowing the interest? Reply By satbir singhwahi: The Reply: Department has done adhoc diallowance of 1/10 th of interest claimed . Wrongly alleged that funds were not fully utilised for business purpose. Reply By MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN: The Reply: N....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ow it is obligation on you to prove the allegation of the Department. Reply By satbir singhwahi: The Reply: Sir That i will prove. But want some case laws to substantiate to follow past orders if facts are same with previous years. Reply By MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN: The Reply: If you give the facts of your case, then it can be possible to trace out the similar case laws. Reply By satbir singhw....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ahi: The Reply: Sir The fact of case 2013-14 is A.O. has disallowed 1/10 interest claimed , being not fully utilised for business. Wheras loan taken in 2008-09 and fully utilised for business purpose. No new loan taken. But A.O. has allowed full interest in 2008-09 to 2012-13. Reply By MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN: The Reply: OK I will try for you. Reply By satbir singhwahi: The Reply: Thanks Sir<....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....