Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (9) TMI 1293

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : Mr. Ved Jain, Mr.Pranjal Srivastava, Advocates ORDER 1. The Revenue is in appeal against an order dated 30th September, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT') in ITA Nos. 3166/DEL/2009 & 3203/DEL/2009 for the Assessment Year ('AY') 2000- 01. 2. The issue urged by the Revenue is whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the additions of Rs. 16,34,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Despite the AO being aware of the above development, he did not himself undertake any inquiry into the question whether the purchases and sales were made from and to bogus entities. 4. The CIT (A) had in the appeal by the Assessee restricted the additions to peak credits and this led both the Revenue and the Assessee to also file an appeal before the ITAT. The ITAT in the impugned order common ....