2017 (9) TMI 1209
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mber (Technical) Rep. by Shri Piyush Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. Rep. by Shri S. Nunthuk, DR for the respondent. ORDER Per: Dr. Satish Chandra The present appeal is filed against the order-in-original No.02/SU/COMMR./2013 dated 11.01.2013. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a CHA licence holder. One consignment has come from China, which was lying unclaimed....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... The appellant has no role pertaining to the container in question. He also submits that regarding the earlier clearance of the container, no discrepancy was found by the Department. On query from the Bench, he admits that M/s. Planet Overseas was non-existent at given address. He submits that on the earlier occasion, for clearance of the consignment, documents submitted by the appellant were avai....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..../2016 dated 15.12.2016 (B) Shri Boria Ram, Superintendent & Ors Vs. CC, New Delhi- Final Order No.52181-52183/2017-CU(DB) dated 7.3.2017 (C) Falcon India Vs. CC, New Delhi (Import & General) - 2015(326) ELT 728 (Tribunal-Delhi) 6. On the other hand, ld. Counsel for the Department, Shri S. Nunthuk has relied on the impugned order. He submits that just before one month, the appellant has cl....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mains that in the instant case, the appellant has not submitted any documents to clear the container in question. It is the submission of the ld. Counsel that he does not know that Shri Karandeep Singh who is the Proprietor of M/s. Planet Overseas and he never met with him. The documents for the earlier consignment were received by Mr. Surender, who had received the documents from Mr. Ravish Kumar....
TaxTMI