2017 (9) TMI 1080
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Balamurugan, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER The above appeal was listed for hearing on 17.7.2017 and was adjourned to this day on request by the counsel for the appellant. The matter has been remanded by the Hon'ble High Court vide judgment dated 11.9.2014. 2. In this appeal, originally a docket order was passed on 3.6.2009 whereby the Tribunal had partly allowed the appeal ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....titled to dispose of the appeal appropriately " 3. Thus, it is seen that the' High Court on appeal by the appellant herein, has set aside the second order (imposing a penalty of Rs. 6 lakhs) and has remanded the matter to the Tribunal to look into and verify and record whether the first order is supported by reasons and if so, whether it has been withdrawn. We therefore first proceed ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... b. On the same day, it is seen that the file was entrusted to Member (Technical) for drafting orders. Later, on 31.8.2009, the Member (Technical) has addressed to Member (Judicial) requesting for rehearing the matter. A copy of this letter is seen issued to Hon'ble President of CESTAT, New Delhi, Member (Technical), CESTAT, Chennai and Assistant Registrar, CESTAT, Chennai. c. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is letter was received on 23.10.2009 at 12:00 noon by SPS, Chennai. f. On 23.10.2009, an endorsement was made on this letter by Member (Judicial) to obtain clarification from President since more than four months have elapsed after the hearing date. On the same date, the Registrar, CESTAT, New Delhi has issued letter to Deputy Registrar, CESTAT, Chennai, which is received in CESTAT,....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI