Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (9) TMI 996

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n below: Appeal No. Period of dispute OIA No.   Total demand in SCN   Amount disallowed   Penalty   Amount reversed   ST/21082/2015 ST/21083/2015 September 2007 to October 2011 November 2011 to September 2012   No.35/2014 dt.30.01.2015 No.38/2015 dt.30.01.2015   Rs.16,44,271/- Rs.14,50,269/-   Rs.16,19,047/- Rs.12,45,060/-   Rs.16,19,047/- Rs.12,45,060/-   Rs.13,070 (on 21.2.2012 during verification of records-     2. For the sake of convenience, the facts of appeal No.ST/21082/2015 are taken. Appellants are holders of Central Excise registration certificate and manufacturers of excisabl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sioner (A) after considering the submissions of the appellant rejected the appeal and hence, the present appeal. 3. Heard both the parties and perused the records. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law as the same has been passed by misconstruing the provisions of Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004. She has also submitted that the impugned order is contrary to the binding judicial precedents on the same issue. She further submitted that appellants have received input service viz., repair and maintenance of chemical pipelines, coving and epoxy, electrical maintenance, installation of electrical works, fabrication and erection of machinery, technical manpower supply, wall painting etc. Appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to prove that the appellant had not raised any civil structure, the appellant has produced invoices, the statement containing the details of input services received and the photographs of the machineries in respect of which input services are received. 5. On the other hand, the learned AR reiterated the findings of the impugned order and submitted that appellants have utilized the services towards construction activity such as removing of earth pit, painting, room partitioning and piping work, electrical services which are out of the purview of definition of input service . He further submitted that the impugned services do not have any nexus directly or indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of finished goods. Therefore, the av....