2017 (9) TMI 994

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....D. Naveena, Advocate for the Appellant Shri R. Subramaniam, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER The above applications are filed by the appellant seeking restoration of the appeals which were dismissed by the Tribunal vide Final Order Nos. on the ground of non-compliance of predeposit. 2.  On behalf of the appellant, learned counsel Ms. D. Naveena submitted that the business was orig....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o restore the appeals. 3.  Against this, the learned AR Shri R. Subramanian opposes the applications. He submitted that the appellants were directed to pay Rs. 9 lakhs as predeposit and to report compliance on or before 7.6.2013. The Tribunal had dismissed the appeals for non-compliance of the predeposit after giving sufficient opportunity to the appellant. That the appellants having not c....