2017 (9) TMI 679

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r>T. S. Sivagnanam, J. For Petitioner : Mr. P. M. Subramaniam For Respondents : Mr. K. Venkatesh ORDER Heard Mr.P.M.Subramaniam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, accepting notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. 3. The petitioner is a re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itioner came to know that a review has been filed before the said authority to review the Clarification dated 22.07.2014. Therefore, the petitioner, in his reply dated  24.05.2017 stated that till the review is decided by the second respondent, the petitioner's  assessment need not be revised. The petitioner also referred to an order passed by this Court in W.P.No.27345 of 2014 dated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e petitioner has filed a review petition, pursuant to the direction issued by this Court and the matter is now pending consideration before the authority, similar direction should be issued in the instant case, so as to protect the interest of the dealer as well as to ensure that correct rate of tax is collected from the dealer and the interest of the Revenue would also safe-guarded. 6. Accordi....