2017 (9) TMI 394
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Sales Tax<br>MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. BIREN VAISHNAV, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr Pranav Trivedi, AGP For The Respondent : Rule Served ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These three petitions are filed by the State Government challenging a common judgement of the Value Added Tax Tribunal dated 04.02.2005 passed in Revision Application Nos. 1 to 3 of 2004. Br....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of the respondent firm, the Revision authority passed an order dated 24.12.2003 and recomputed the tax liability and consequently computed that a ceiling of Rs. 25,97,342/- of turnover would be leftover for the year 1996-97. 3. The assessee challenged this order before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, by the impugned judgement dated 04.02.2005, set aside the revision order on the short ground that ....
TaxTMI