2017 (1) TMI 1427
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....itioner : S. Raveekumar For the Respondents : K. Venkatesh, GA ORDER 1. Issue notice. Mr.K.Venkatesh, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 2. With the consent of counsels for parties, the Writ Petitions are taken up for final hearing and disposal. 3. The captioned Writ Petitions are directed against six (6) assessment orders of even date, i.e., 12.12.2016. 3.1. By virtue o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 5. Counsel for the petitioner, in my view, correctly argues that reversal of ITC, on the basis of a mere mismatch in information, could not have taken place, and that, this issue is covered by various judgments passed by this Court. For this purpose, learned counsel for the petitioner inter-alia relies upon the following judgments: (i) ALTHAF SHOES (P) LTD. VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIO....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt Circle, Chennai Vs. M/s.Infiniti Wholesale Ltd., (Formerly known as Woolworths Wholesale (India) Pvt. Ltd., Chennai. 8. In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside. The respondent is directed to rework the assessment bearing in mind the judgments referred to above." 5. In these circumstances, I have put to Mr.Venkatesh as to whether the best way forward would be to redo th....


TaxTMI