2016 (11) TMI 1449

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER Issue in appeal relates to denial of Cenvat credit on input services related to co-ordination fees paid by appellant for an amount of Rs. 75,963/- for the period February, 2012 to September, 2012. 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, Ms. Minchu Mariam Punnoose, ld. Advocate appearing for appellant submitted that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ss of manufacturing of the final product of the appellant and that they qualify as "input service" for the purpose of Rule 2(l) of the CCR, 2004. 3. On the other hand, ld. AR reiterated the correctness of the impugned order. 4. Heard both sides. I find that Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the denial of credit on co-ordination service on the ground that the said service does not f....