Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (8) TMI 932

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act') is directed against the order dated 7th December, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT') in ITA No. 3667/Del/2012 for the Assessment Year ('AY') 2008-09. 2. The first question sought to be urged by the Revenue in this appeal is whether the ITAT erred in confirming the order of the Commissioner of In....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sue. 5. The second issue concerns the legality of the deletion by the CIT(A) of a disallowance of Rs. 4,07,202/- made by the Assessing Officer under Section 37 (1) of the Act. Here again, although the Assessee had not produced the relevant vouchers before the AO, it did so before the CIT(A). The factual findings in this regard are not shown to be perverse and, therefore, the Court declines to f....