Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (8) TMI 669

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 30.12.2015 in O.C. NO. 427/2015 passed by the Adjudicating Authority. The pleadings in the above said appeal are complete. When the matter was taken on 9th March, 2017, the learned counsel for the appellants has merely raised the issue that the entire proceedings have been vitiated as the impugned order has not been passed within 180 days from the date of passing the provisional attachment order dated 10th March, 2015. He says that the impugned order was passed on 30th December, 2015 is beyond the period of 180 days. It is also submitted by him that in appeal no. FPA-PMLA- 984/BNG/2015 filed by the appellants, this tribunal has allowed granting six months ti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....D/-11-9-2009 Ramesh Chandra Agrawal Vs. Regency Hospital Ltd. and Ors.; In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh (Indore Bench) Criminal Appeal No. 890/2009 decided on 29.11.2012, Appellant-Mohanlal Arya V/s. State of Madhya Pradesh through S.P.E. Lokayuktha, Indore, Respondent; AIR 1976 Supreme Court 263 1975 Cri. LJ 1993 (From Gujarat) Criminal appeal no. 158 of 1972, D/-27-8-1975 Govind Lal Chaggan Lal Patel, Appellant V/s. The Agriculture Produce Market Committeee and Others, Respondent." 4. On the other hand Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam submits that the order dated 11th August, 2015 was passed in presence of the parties, the same was not challenged by the appellant in High Court. Even the appellants (including the appellant in the presen....