Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1973 (12) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ault in terms of section 271(1)(a) and (c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as " the Act "). The Income-tax Officer, for the assessment years 1958-59 and 1959-60, finally assessed the assessee on 29th March, 1967. The total income assessed was Rs. 1,01,712 and Rs. 98,035, respectively. Penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(a) and 271(1)(c) of the Act was also initiated for both the years. The assessee then moved a petition in April, 1967, before the Commissioner of Income-tax for settlement of his tax liability for various years, including the assessment years 1958-59 and 1959-60. The Commissioner called for a report from the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Range-C, Amritsar, and on receipt of his rep....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion for settlement is decided. The Commissioner of Income-tax has desired that you may please explain the above position to the assessee and seek his agreement. The assessee's reaction to the above proposal may then be communicated to this office. " The assessee conveyed his acceptance of the decision to the Income-tax Officer, vide annexure " C " dated 14th January, 1969, and annexure " H-3 ", dated 16th January, 1969. Annexure " H-3 " relates to the matter of penalty. An application was made by the assessee to the Commissioner of Income-tax wherein in paragraph (10) thereof it is stated as under: " That in the circumstances, pointed out above, it is prayed that the file of the assessee may be summoned, the assessee may be heard thro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he question, it will be advisable to refer to section 271 of the Act. The scheme of the section is this : that sub-section (1) creates three offences in clauses (a), (b) and (c) and penalty for them is provided in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii). Sub-section (4A) of section 271 of the Act deals with the powers of the Commissioner and is in the following terms: " (4A) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (i) or clause (iii) of sub-section (1), the Commissioner may, in his discretion (i) reduce or waive the amount of minimum penalty imposable on a person under clause (i) of sub-section (1) for failure, without reasonable cause, to furnish the return of total income which such person was required to furnish under sub-section (1) of sect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t year, or, where such disclosure relates to more than one assessment year, the aggregate amount of such income for those years, exceeds a sum of five hundred thousand rupees, no order reducing or waiving the penalty shall be made by the Commissioner unless the previous approval of the Board has been obtained. Vide sub-section (4B) of section 271 of the Act, which is in the following terms, the order of the Commissioner is final: (4B) An order under sub-section (4A) shall be final and shall not be called in question before any court of law or any other authority. " It is not disputed that the power to levy penalties under section 271(1) of the Act lies with the Income-tax Officer except in the case of clause (c) where the amount of....