2017 (7) TMI 613
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Dr.K. Shivram, Senior Counse, a/w. Ms.Neelam C. Jadhav for the Respondent ORDER PER COURT : 1] The Revenue has filed the appeal on following questions; "6.3 Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, orders of the Tribunal was perverse in deleting the addition of Rs. 95,00,000/made u/s. 68 of the Act, relying only on the documentary evidence produced by the R....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nsel for the Assessee submits that the Assessing Officer upon considering all the facts had added Rs. 95 lakhs as income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. It needs to be considered that the Assessee had not discharged its onus to establish that the amount was received by the Assessee from the share holders as share application money. The Assessee could not prove the identity of the creditors....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ey and relevant record is produced with regard to the allotment of shares to those parties. The share application form, allotment letter, share certificate are also produced. Even the balancesheet, profit and loss account, the books of account of these creditors were produced on record showing that they had sufficient funds for investing in the shares of the Assessee. The learned counsel relies on....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... amount was deposited in their account. 6] The Tribunal has considered that the Assessee has produced on record the documents to establish the genuineness of the party such as PAN of all the creditors along with the confirmation, their bank statements showing payment of share application money. It was also observed by the Tribunal that the Assessee has also produced the entire record regarding ....
TaxTMI