2017 (7) TMI 588
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....For Petitioner : Mr.N.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.Rajasekaran, CGSC (R1) Mr.V.Venkatesan, CGSC (R2) ORDER Heard Mr.N.Kannan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Rajasekaran, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for R1 and Mr.V.Venkatesan, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for R2. 2.1 The petitioner is a Company, engaged in the manufacture of automobile goods, which ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....etitioner by issuing the impugned proceedings to the 3rd respondent Bank, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. At the time when the writ petition was entertained, an order of status-quo was granted on 26.06.2008, which is in force till date. 4. The consistent case of the petitioner is that they have completed the export obligation by exporting the products through third party expo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tition is whether the petitioner has fulfilled his export obligation. If the scheme provides for the importer to export the goods through third party exporters, then, the competent authority under the Scheme is entitled to examine the correctness of the stand taken by the exporter. In the instant case, the department would admit that the petitioner had produced copies of the shipping bills, but th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e, if the scheme provides for such exports through third parties, then the proper officer of the Joint Directorate General of Foreign Trade, shall examine the genuineness of those exports and pass a speaking order, on merits and in accordance with law. 8. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner had expired and not being renew....
TaxTMI