TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (7) TMI 80
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....st of the manufacturer, M/s Ningbo Huanchi Imp & Exp Co Ltd, China, revealed much higher values, the proper officer of customs directed the importer to produce authenticated copy of pricelist and invoice of manufacturer and, upon failure to do so, proposed to reject the declared value for assessment of the goods in accordance with the pricelist as well as prices of contemporaneous imports. 2. Appellant proceeded to seek writ remedy from the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay and, in accordance with directions, was allowed provisional assessment which was finalised within the specified timeframe. The goods were provisionally assessed and allowed clearance following which show cause notice dated 14^th September 2006 was issued to the importe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....uisite for clearance. Normally such assessment is resorted to only in three specified circumstances of which one arises from a request on the part of the importer while the other two arise from a determination on the part of proper officer that there is lack of wherewithal to assess owing to inadequacy of information. Finalisation of provisional assessment should necessarily follow the bridging of the void that precluded assessment. It would appear from the show cause notice that, except for the authenticated pricelist/invoice of the manufacturer, necessary information was available with the assessing authority at the time of import which the importer was called upon to make available. Though the show cause notice does assert that the authe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as was the case in Padia Sales Corporation. It is also not the respondent's case that the particular import fell within any of the situations enumerated in Rule 4(2). No reason has been given by the Assistant Collector for rejecting the transaction value under Rule 4(1) except the price list of vendor. In doing so, the Assistant Collector not only ignored Rule 4(2) but also acted on the basis of the vendor's price list as if a price list is invariably proof of the transaction value. This was erroneous and could not be a reason by itself to reject the transaction value. A discount is a commercially acceptable measure, which may be resorted to by a vendor for a variety of reasons including stock clearance. A price list is really no m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ice of assessment followed by the department' for justifying resort to pricelist of 2000. We also do not find any evidence of the provenance of the pricelist or of it having been subjected to the test of acceptability in adjudication proceedings. It would, therefore, appear that the adoption of the values in the pricelist for assessment would not be consistent with rule 8 of the Rules supra. It would also appear that the impugned order has proceeded directly to rule 8 without sequentially applying the rules preceding it. It is also seen from the appeal before us that an agreement for a substantially large order had been contracted with the seller in Singapore who had entered into an agreement for supply by the manufacturer. The impugned....