2017 (7) TMI 46
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e - for the appellants Shri R.K. Manjhi, Authorized Representative (DR) - for the respondent ORDER Per. Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra The present appeals have been filed by the appellants against the order dated 31/05/2006. 2. None appeared on behalf of the appellants. We have heard Shri R.K. Manjhi, learned AR for the Revenue and perused the appeal records. The preliminary point is ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....962. 4. It is also seen that after the declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court (Supra), the provisions of section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 were amended with effect from 08.04.2011 vide Finance Act, 2011. 5. It is also noticed that in order to overcome the situation created by the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sayed Ali (supra), Notification No. 44/2011-Cus (NT),....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....I officers having the proper jurisdiction to issue the SCN or not had came up before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Mangali Impex Ltd. vs. Union of India [2016 (335) E.L.T. 605 (Del.)], and the High Court inter-alia, held that even the new inserted Section 28 (11) does not empower either the officers of DRI or the DGCEI to issue the SCN for the period prior to 08/04/2011. Thus, it is ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....efore the Hon'ble Supreme Court [2016-TIOL-173-SC-CUS / 2016 (339) ELT A 49 (SC)]. 10. It may be mentioned that recently, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of BSNL Vs. UOI vide writ petition no. C/4438/2017 and CM No. 19387/2017 has dealt with the identical issue where the notice was also issued by DRI. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has considered the judgment in the case of Mangali....
TaxTMI