TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (6) TMI 1057
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ellant Shri R.K. Manjhi, DR for the respondent ORDER Per Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra The present appeals have been filed by the appellant against the order no. 14-2008 dated 19.02.2008. 2. During the course of arguments, the appellant's counsel has raised the preliminary plea that the show cause notice in the instant case was issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). The Hon'b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ommissioner of Customs vs. Sayed Ali, 2011 (265) 17 (SC)], the DRI officers were not proper officers in terms of section 2(34) of the Customs Act, 1962. 6. It is also seen that after the declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court (Supra), the provisions of section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 were amended with effect from 08.04.2011 vide Finance Act, 2011. 7. It is also noticed that in order....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... to various DRI officers with retrospective effect. 9. Later on, i.e. for the period subsequent to the amendment, the matter i.e. the DRI officers having the proper jurisdiction to issue the SCN or not had came up before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Mangali Impex vs. Union of India [2016 335 ELT 605 Del], and the High Court inter alia, held that even the new inserted section 28 (11....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ranted the stay of operation of the judgment passed by the High Court of Delhi. Thus the issue is subjudice before the Hon'ble Supreme Court [2016-TIOL-173-SC-CUS / 2016 (339) ELT A 49 (SC)]. 12. It may be mentioned that recently, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of BSNL Vs. UOI vide writ petition no. C/4438/2017 and CM No. 19387/2017 has dealt with the the identical issue where the no....