Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1970 (11) TMI 4

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....emaining two-thirds. On 29th May, 1962 the constitution of the firm was changed by taking four minors also as partners. The five original partners took 14 per cent. each as the shares and the remaining 30 per cent. was distributed equally among the four minors. The reconstitution was to take effect from 1st June, 1962, though the accounts of the firm as constituted originally continued till 30th June. In other words, for the first half year, the firm as constituted originally continued and for the second half year, the firm as reconstituted was treated as another firm. The Income-tax Officer assessed the two periods separately; but the Commissioner of Income-tax felt that such separate assessment for the two periods was erroneous and prejud....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d be carried over and adjusted towards the profit the firm made during that year, in other words, the share of the loss of the partners who had retired could not be carried over. This conclusion is of no avail to the assessee in the present case. But, one observation of Hegde J., who spoke for the Division Bench, is relied upon by the counsel for the assessee. The observation appearing at the end of the first paragraph of page 280 of the reports is: "In other words, if it is found that a change has occurred in the constitution of the firm, assessment will have to be made on the firm as constituted at the time of making the assessment and not on the firm that was in existence earlier. From this it follows, for the purpose of assessment, e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing on any business, profession or vocation had been succeeded in such capacity by another person, such person and such other persons should each be assessed, etc. The corresponding section of the Act of 1961, we mean section 188 of the new Act, provides that where a firm carrying on a business or profession is succeeded by another firm and the case is not one covered by section 187, separate assessments shall be made, etc. An expression similar to "and the case is not one covered by section 187" found in section 188 of the new Act is absent in sub-section (2) of section 26 of the old Act. We do not propose to consider whether this difference in language justified or warranted the observation of Hegde J. extracted by us hereinbefore, becaus....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....where a firm carrving on a business or profession is succeeded by another firm, and the case is not one covered by section 187, separate assessments shall be made on the predecessor firm and the successor firm. The argument of the counsel for the assessee is that, though the case before us is only one where a change has occurred in the constitution of the firm, the assessment should be in the manner indicated by section 188, viz., the firm as constituted originally should be assessed for the first half year and the firm as constituted after the change in the constitution should be assessed for the second half year as another firm. The counsel relies on the observation of Hegde J. that, "for the purpose of assessment, every change in the ....