2017 (5) TMI 587
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....DER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had instituted two complaint cases they having been registered as complaint case nos.07/2/15 and 08/02/15 impleading the second to fourth respondent as accused persons, each case alleging offence having been committed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (N.I. Act) respecting two different cheques they being cheque nos.035145 dated 07.07.2012 an....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nts were summoned and put to trial on the basis of notices under Section 251 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) issued and served on 03.10.2016 to which the respondents pleaded not guilty. 3. The evidence was led by the complainant by examining its authorised representative Mr. D.N. Raju (PW-1). The complainant having rested its case in both the matters after the said evidence, st....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s had been returned, the complainant itself described the reasons for such return as "account freezed". This is what was reiterated by complainant's witness V.N. Raju in his affidavit submitted with the complaint. When he was examined on fresh affidavit at the trial he reiterated the reason now referring to the remarks in the return memos the same being "account blocked". The learned Metropolit....
TaxTMI