2017 (5) TMI 386

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... J. Vyas, Advocate For Respondent (s): Shri J. Nagori, Authorised Representative Per: Dr. D. M. Misra These appeals are filed against OIO No.11/Commissioner/2007 dated 30/11/2007 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-I. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant M/s Shriram Tubes Pvt. Ltd & Ors. Were issued with a SCN dated 08.09.2006 alleging clandest....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... same was not extended to them resulting into gross violation of principles of natural justice. He submits that even though they have earlier requested for cross examination of the five witnesses however, now they request cross-examination of Shri Sushil Kumar Patodia and Shri Hari Prasad Agrawal. In support, he has relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case. 4. Ld. Advocate ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he material was supplied. 5. Per contra, Ld. AR for the Revenue submits that the allegation against M/s. Shriram Tubes Pvt Ltd is that they have not received any material from the manufacturer M/s Matiz Metals Pvt. Ltd and also cleared the goods clandestinely manufactured on their own account, without payment of duty. He has no objection in remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority all....