Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (5) TMI 224

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent : None ORDER Per: Anil Choudhary This appeal by Revenue is on the ground that the Commissioner (Appeals) have erred in remanding the matter to Adjudicating Authority, and thus have exceeded jurisdiction. 2. Heard ld. A.R and perused the records. 3. I find that the Commissioner (Appeals) recorded the following findings:- "I have carefully gone through the facts and reco....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appellant has contended that they have not been issued a reasoned Order-in-Original. The Assistant Commissioner, Customs has submitted that the appellant vide letter dated 28.10.2009 admitted the fact of mis-declaration and agreeing with the findings of the Customs officer paid appropriate duty, redemption fine and penalty. On a perusal of the relevant file produced by the department at ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the said letter, they have further admitted that they are aware that by mis-declaring the goods an offence under the Customs Act has been committed and waived the requirement of issue of show cause notice or personal hearing. Further vide letter dated 10.9.2009 addressed to the Commissioner, Central Excise, Noida and Dy. Commissioner, Customs, Noida, the appellant requested the goods may be cleare....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y There are scores of judgements on the issues involved in these appeals. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Collector of Customs vs. Swastik Woolen Industries 1991 (47) ELT 216 (SC) held the confiscation and imposition of penalty not valid where suo moto offer by importer for mutilation of rags to the satisfaction of the adjudicating authority was declined by the department. Similar p....