2017 (5) TMI 92

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., D.R. - for the respondent ORDER Per Dr. Satish Chandra The present appeal is filed against the Order-in-Appeal No.475/2011 dated 20.12.2011. 2. The brief facts of the case are that during the period under consideration (10.5.2008 to 31.12.2010), the appellant was engaged in the manufacture of flexible packaging laminates falling under Chapter 39 of the First Schedule to the Central E....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ess of metallization gets reduced to aluminium dust which is in the nature of aluminium ash, containing small percentage of inferior quality aluminium. The aluminium dust which arises as a result of process of metallization of printed plastic film is cleared by the appellant without payment of duty under the cover of proper invoices. The department has demanded the duty. Being aggrieved, the appel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion F. No. - 96/85/2015-CX.1 dated 7.12.2015. Lastly, he submits that the duty on the aluminium dust is not leviable. So, impugned order may be set aside. 4. On the other hand, Shri H.C. Saini, ld. DR relied on the impugned order. 5. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of record, it appears that the case laws cited by the appellant are not direct on the issue and the same is dist....