2016 (12) TMI 1582

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HC (Judgement / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 9-12-2016<br>C.M.A. Nos. 133 and 134 of 2011 - -<br>Central Excise<br>Huluvadi G. Rameshthe And Anita Sumanththe, JJ. For the Appellant S. Murugappan For the Respondents Umesh Rao K. JUDGMENT Dr. Anita Sumanth, J. The appellant suffered an order of the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise disallowing CENVAT credit on prepaid explosi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5 months and 14 days. Along with the appeals, miscellaneous petitions for condonation of delay were filed. The CESTAT was not inclined to condone the delay on the ground that no satisfactory reason has been adduced by the appellant. The miscellaneous applications thus stood dismissed vide order dated 1.6.2007, in consequence whereof, the appeals were dismissed as time barred. 2. The reason c....