2017 (4) TMI 649
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....T) Ms. Asmita Nayak, Advocate, for the Appellant. Ms. Neha Garg, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The present COD application stands filed by the appellant with a prayer to condone the delay of around 37 months in presenting the appeal. 2. We find that the impugned order was passed on 22-3-2013 and was received by the appellant on 28-3-2013. There....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on. 4. We find that the entire factual circumstances and developments reveal that the appeal was originally filed in the Tribunal's Registry with the delay of only 5 days. It is thereafter when the defects were pointed out by the Registry and the appeal papers were returned, a lot of communication occurred between the Delhi advocate and the local consultant, who had actually prepared the app....