2016 (1) TMI 1269

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mas Mathew Nellimoottil, SCs, for the Respondent. JUDGMENT The challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P9 notice issued to the Manager of the Federal Bank Limited, the 6th respondent herein, directing him to recover the amounts that were confirmed on the petitioner company by way of service tax for the period 1-10-2001 to 31-3-2004 by Order (Original) No. 7/2011-S.T., 27-4-2011 of the Depu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oss the bar, I find that, the demand of service tax dues, together with applicable interest and penalty was in respect of the petitioner-company. It is not in dispute that the order dated 27-4-2011 of the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Kottayam Division, was not the subject matter of challenge in any appellate proceedings instituted at the instance of the petitioner-company. That being the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....el for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner-company is presently going through financial difficulties. Taking note of the said submission of counsel for the petitioner, I direct that, if the petitioner discharges its liability to respondents 1 to 5 pursuant to Order (Original) No. 7/2011-S.T., dated 27-4-2011 in 10 equal successive monthly instalments commencing from 5-2-2016, then furt....