Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (4) TMI 1217

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....challenges the order-in-original dated 14th March, 2014 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, ICD, Tughlakabad, confirming the duty demand of Rs. 5,60,00,000/- and further imposed a penalty of Rs. 25 lakhs. 2. The facts leading to the present petition are that the petitioner obtained an advance authorisation dated 25th April, 2008 from the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, New....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... AC in different colours and shades, Duranex plastic coloured compound. 4. In addition, there were two other advance authorisation obtained by the petitioner from the office of the Joint DGFT on 31st August, 2007 and 2nd January, 2009. It is stated that the petitioner moved an application on 20th July, 2011 to the office of DGFT for clubbing and redemption of the above advance authorisations....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ile, the impugned order had been passed on 14th March, 2014 but was not served on the petitioner. This impugned order is numbered as AO No. 139/2014/EPM/DC/ICD/TKD, and is in relation to the advance licence No. 0510219762/2/03/00, dated 25th April, 2008. The reason for confirming the aforementioned duty demand of Rs. 5.6 crores and penalty of Rs. 25 lakhs was that the petitioner had not submitted ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) Order dated 25th August, 2015 in W.P. (C) No. 7896 of 2015 (Jonson Rubber Industries Ltd. v. UOI) (ii) Order dated 12th January, 2016 in W.P. (C) No. 10031 of 2015 = 2016 (334) E.L.T. 410 (Del.) (Lifelong India Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI) (iii) Order dated 15th January, 2016 in W.P. (C) No. 11852 of 2015 (Lloyd Electric & Engineering Ltd. v. UOI) (iv) Order dated 29th January, 2016 ....