2017 (3) TMI 1412
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....llant Ms. Padmavati Patil i/b. M/s. Aparna Hirandagi for the respondent ORDER P. C. 1. On 11th July, 2014, the tribunal allowed the respondent-assessee's appeal. The assessee's appeal, allowed by the tribunal, arose out of the order-in-original dated 16th January, 2012 of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-I. The issue pertains to availment of certain input services and ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at the tribunal holds is that it is not disputed that the assessee being the manufacturer has availed of the services in the course of its business. Therefore, it is entitled to input service credit of all the services. 2. Ms. Cardozo would submit that there was no concession that the matter has been covered by the judgment in Ultratech Cement Ltd. (supra) and that judgment dealt with a specifi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ission charges; (vi) aviation charges and (vii) courier services availed by the respondent were after the clearance of goods from its factory? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the CESTAT was justified in law in setting aside the orderin- original bearing No. 84/BR/84-Thane-I/2011 dated 16- 01-2012 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Thane-I and allowing the ....
TaxTMI